The end of another season is now on us, a six month winter lull faces us and I need yet again to have your ideas regarding how IHRO should progress for the coming years.

The season has been a success on the whole with some very good racing and some exemplary displays of riding.

High spots of 2008 for me were:

1. The whole meeting at Chimay, the atmosphere was just fabulous as befits what is probably one of the best road circuits in the world.
2. Watching Luke Notton at Gedinne going through the chicane, pure poetry.
3. Watching Jarno Jonker all year on the BMW, so sooth.
4. Watching Ives Glauser everywhere, such commitment.
5. The season long midfield battles between Rob den Tieter and Jos Sassen with David Lock and Bernd Pollmann as occasional guest entries.
6. The friendly atmosphere in the paddock and at the socials, particularly at Schleiz, Chimay and Djursland.
7. The number of people who took the time to thank both Euwain and myself for our efforts.

However there are a few areas which are causing concern.

The major concern is that at some meetings we have not had the level of entries that we have previously enjoyed, Brands Hatch in particular was embarrassing in its level of entries. There have been many reasons put forward to me over the season why entries are declining:

1.The cost of entries and travelling to meetings is on the increase and of course this does play a major role.

2.The current popularity of other formats of racing like the Lansdowne Cup are taking some of the entries for a few reasons, the machines are not as highly developed (honestly !!) as those allowed in IHRO, the riders are not (by and large) young hard chargers and some people feel more confident there as they are able to get better results.

3.The machine eligibility of IHRO causes some concern, this has always been, and will continue to be, a difficult area but I do try my best. A few years ago, there was much complaint about the ‘supermono’ singles which it was felt were destroying the class, now it has shifted and the ‘supermono’ manufacturers, owners and riders are now complaining about the Patons. One manufacturer has told me he has no intention of pitting his machines against 8 valve twins as he is unable to win as he does not have the currently best rider/machine combination. This is overstating the case I feel as realistically there is only one Paton and rider combination who have raced with IHRO this year which has proven unbeatable, other Paton / rider combinations have not been anywhere near as successful.

One thing that will not change is the type of machine which IHRO caters for. The underlying reason for eligibility to race with IHRO is: did a machine of that type race in a Grand Prix in the period, if the answer is yes, then the machine is eligible, I may restrict the eligibility to the particular individual machine, or I may accept all machines of that type as replicas, that choice is mine to make. There will be no changes to allow later two stroke machines or any more converted road machines to race, this is not open to discussion, IHRO has it’s place in the racing world and will stay true to those aims or cease to run at all. There are plenty of other classes for these other bikes. I opened up the classes a bit for the 250 cc class which has been slow starting but hopefully will have more support next year.

4. Circuit choice, are the circuits we use a problem?, I know that some people do not like any one particular circuit, we all have our preferences, but in general are they what you want to ride at?.

5. Championship, or lack thereof. Do you want a championship? if the answer is yes then the registration fee will have to increase to provide quality trophies at the end of the year, unless we got a sponsor to provide them of course. IHRO has always run the races as individual events to avoid putting pressure on riders to have to attend all meetings, but if YOU want a championship and are prepared to pay for it then let me know, we would be talking of an increase of at least 50% on the registration fees to cover the costs.

6. Push Starts. The old chestnut resurfaces!. As far as I know, IHRO is the last organisation still using this procedure, how many people does this ACTUALLY discourage, I am not talking about the pros and cons of push versus clutch starts, but what effect, if any is it having on entries.

Solutions which have been put forward in discussions include the following:

1. Incorporate a ‘Lansdowne’ type classification within the overall races.
2. Further restrict Patons, by for example reducing carburettor size to 32mm or by insisting they run only 2 valve heads.
3. Get races at GP or WSB, please bear in mind that to get to a GP or WSB we would need to pay the organisers a probable minimum of 20,000 Euros for a time slot, even IF they would agree.
4. Only have ‘nearby’ meetings. Nearby to whom?? The two furthest meetings for most people, Schleiz and Djursland were both very successful and enjoyable. The nearest to most people, i.e. within the UK and only just up from the ferry for continental riders, Brands Hatch, was the worst supported event EVER!!

So it is over to you for POSITIVE ideas, if all I get is negative responses then I will not post them.

Although IHRO is a ‘Benevolent Dictatorship’ I really need your honest feedback so I can decide how to go forward, if you don’t reply, then don’t complain afterwards.