<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Future for IHRO 2010 Onwards</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ihro.org.uk/2009/05/the-future-for-ihro-2010-onwards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ihro.org.uk/2009/05/the-future-for-ihro-2010-onwards/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-future-for-ihro-2010-onwards</link> <description>International Historic Racing Organisation</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:46:53 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Roel Weijers</title><link>http://www.ihro.org.uk/2009/05/the-future-for-ihro-2010-onwards/#comment-124</link> <dc:creator>Roel Weijers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 18:50:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ihro.org.uk/?p=495#comment-124</guid> <description>As an 350 competitor I don&#039;t mind to race together with the 500 singles. And if in the near future I want to race a 500 single Ducati, I don&#039;t mind to race with multi&#039;s. Mostly it is possible to have the second ride anyway with the organisation like CRMC or CRMB own 500 or 350 classes</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an 350 competitor I don&#8217;t mind to race together with the 500 singles. And if in the near future I want to race a 500 single Ducati, I don&#8217;t mind to race with multi&#8217;s. Mostly it is possible to have the second ride anyway with the organisation like CRMC or CRMB own 500 or 350 classes</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: No Scholl</title><link>http://www.ihro.org.uk/2009/05/the-future-for-ihro-2010-onwards/#comment-117</link> <dc:creator>No Scholl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:32:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ihro.org.uk/?p=495#comment-117</guid> <description>GRAHAM
Its a good idea putting 350 and 500 together
and 2 3 and 4cylinder gp bikes in an other group
regards No Scholl</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GRAHAM<br
/> Its a good idea putting 350 and 500 together<br
/> and 2 3 and 4cylinder gp bikes in an other group<br
/> regards No Scholl</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave Gilbert</title><link>http://www.ihro.org.uk/2009/05/the-future-for-ihro-2010-onwards/#comment-112</link> <dc:creator>Dave Gilbert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 10:57:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ihro.org.uk/?p=495#comment-112</guid> <description>hello Graham. re multi cylinder GP class
what a great idea to have a second race for multi cylinder GP bikes. I think to get a good grid you should have it split into  350cc and 500cc in one race, mainly on grounds of cost and being able to fill the grid because to convert a TR350 Yamaha for 500cc class would be quite costly</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello Graham. re multi cylinder GP class</p><p>what a great idea to have a second race for multi cylinder GP bikes. I think to get a good grid you should have it split into  350cc and 500cc in one race, mainly on grounds of cost and being able to fill the grid because to convert a TR350 Yamaha for 500cc class would be quite costly</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tony Smith</title><link>http://www.ihro.org.uk/2009/05/the-future-for-ihro-2010-onwards/#comment-111</link> <dc:creator>Tony Smith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 09:28:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ihro.org.uk/?p=495#comment-111</guid> <description>Its good to see that a lot of people are interested in the future of IHRO and are wiling to comment.This dialogue is a good thing, regardless of if the changes happen or not, what IHRO needed was more input from the riders and sponsors.Its the only way you will know which way to go forward.
Keep the comments coming and if are not a member of IHRO and want to comment you can email Graham. info@ihro.org.uk</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its good to see that a lot of people are interested in the future of IHRO and are wiling to comment.</p><p>This dialogue is a good thing, regardless of if the changes happen or not, what IHRO needed was more input from the riders and sponsors.</p><p> Its the only way you will know which way to go forward.<br
/> Keep the comments coming and if are not a member of IHRO and want to comment you can email Graham. <a
href="mailto:info@ihro.org.uk">info@ihro.org.uk</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jean Pierre Capel</title><link>http://www.ihro.org.uk/2009/05/the-future-for-ihro-2010-onwards/#comment-109</link> <dc:creator>Jean Pierre Capel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 22:08:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ihro.org.uk/?p=495#comment-109</guid> <description>I am sure we need more riders now so lets try this idea .
We can never stop time and evolution is the base of life . Lets keep IHRO well alive and continue to race our beloved beauties .
Jean-Pierre</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure we need more riders now so lets try this idea .<br
/> We can never stop time and evolution is the base of life . Lets keep IHRO well alive and continue to race our beloved beauties .<br
/> Jean-Pierre</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Roger Bryant</title><link>http://www.ihro.org.uk/2009/05/the-future-for-ihro-2010-onwards/#comment-105</link> <dc:creator>Roger Bryant</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 15:27:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ihro.org.uk/?p=495#comment-105</guid> <description>Looking at some of the ideas and comments if there was to be 2 races, one original + 1 more modern it would keep the 2 parts separate whilst moving IHRO into a later period which is just as pure to those whose era it is. If the CRMC was being formed today a CBR600 would be old hat!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at some of the ideas and comments if there was to be 2 races, one original + 1 more modern it would keep the 2 parts separate whilst moving IHRO into a later period which is just as pure to those whose era it is. If the CRMC was being formed today a CBR600 would be old hat!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Martin Hudson</title><link>http://www.ihro.org.uk/2009/05/the-future-for-ihro-2010-onwards/#comment-101</link> <dc:creator>Martin Hudson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 10:30:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ihro.org.uk/?p=495#comment-101</guid> <description>I would be happy to race in a singles only mixed 250, 350 and 500 race, and have the option to race in a mixed singles and multicylinder class with air cooled two strokes. I think we could also have two different starting techniques for the two races - push start for the singles as currently, but the multis would have to have clutch starts.  I also suspect that some of the reduction in grids this year is our collective financial situation - regrettably, I cannot afford to do Schleiz this year, but hope to next season. I think Tony&#039;s comment about other non-road circuits is valid - perhaps we could become guests at some of the more interesting French circuits like Pau?  I would not want us to give up on the roads, however, as circuits like Mettet, Schleiz, Chimay and especially Gedinne make racing worthwhile</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be happy to race in a singles only mixed 250, 350 and 500 race, and have the option to race in a mixed singles and multicylinder class with air cooled two strokes. I think we could also have two different starting techniques for the two races &#8211; push start for the singles as currently, but the multis would have to have clutch starts.  I also suspect that some of the reduction in grids this year is our collective financial situation &#8211; regrettably, I cannot afford to do Schleiz this year, but hope to next season. I think Tony&#8217;s comment about other non-road circuits is valid &#8211; perhaps we could become guests at some of the more interesting French circuits like Pau?  I would not want us to give up on the roads, however, as circuits like Mettet, Schleiz, Chimay and especially Gedinne make racing worthwhile</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Horst Patzer</title><link>http://www.ihro.org.uk/2009/05/the-future-for-ihro-2010-onwards/#comment-99</link> <dc:creator>Horst Patzer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 20:18:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ihro.org.uk/?p=495#comment-99</guid> <description>my vote:350 and 500 in one class3-4 cylinder and younger GP bikes in an other group.Can see what happen next season.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my vote:350 and 500 in one class</p><p> 3-4 cylinder and younger GP bikes in an other group.</p><p>Can see what happen next season.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jan Brouwer</title><link>http://www.ihro.org.uk/2009/05/the-future-for-ihro-2010-onwards/#comment-97</link> <dc:creator>Jan Brouwer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 17:19:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ihro.org.uk/?p=495#comment-97</guid> <description>Hi Graham,
I think the the idea of having a single class with the 250/350 and the 500 together racing for their own class win is okay,and the multi&#039;s in a seperate class in the format you have suggested.
I hope this will attract the old and hopefully new riders, so they come riding with us again to keep the IHRO flag flying.
I will continue to support IHRO.
Regards to all, Jan</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Graham,<br
/> I think the the idea of having a single class with the 250/350 and the 500 together racing for their own class win is okay,and the multi&#8217;s in a seperate class in the format you have suggested.<br
/> I hope this will attract the old and hopefully new riders, so they come riding with us again to keep the IHRO flag flying.<br
/> I will continue to support IHRO.<br
/> Regards to all, Jan</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tony Dunnell</title><link>http://www.ihro.org.uk/2009/05/the-future-for-ihro-2010-onwards/#comment-90</link> <dc:creator>Tony Dunnell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 08:13:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ihro.org.uk/?p=495#comment-90</guid> <description>IHRO 2010 and beyondI think the proposed ideas have a lot of merit as long as the combined singles class has a class within a class i.e., someone riding a 250/350 can win the 250/350 class as well as someone riding a 500 can win that class.  All you can do is go ahead and see how it goes, as you say, damned if you do, damned if you don’t.  It seems a good idea that the multi cylinder and grand prix machines have their own class.Might I suggest that IHRO consider sourcing meetings at other  European circuits as well as road circuits, this would undoubtedly attract more entries from riders who will not ride on road circuits.  I appreciate it is not easy but in the days of InCA there were some good circuits and the entry fees were no more than entry fees are now.I know the economic situation now means that a lot of riders are on a tight budget and those who would normally travel to Schleiz are no longer able to because the price of diesel etc., making it harder for the working man and the retired worker.  Therefore, we should be searching for circuits in Europe but closer i.e., France, Belgium and possibly Holland where the cost of getting there is not prohibitive.I also feel that sump guards under engines should be compulsory for IHRO and also silencing should become compulsory as it is in the UK.  This would then allow IHRO to go to more circuits where these rules apply and we wouldn’t be racing on cement dust all the time.I will continue to support IHRO as much as I can whatever is decided.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IHRO 2010 and beyond</p><p>I think the proposed ideas have a lot of merit as long as the combined singles class has a class within a class i.e., someone riding a 250/350 can win the 250/350 class as well as someone riding a 500 can win that class.  All you can do is go ahead and see how it goes, as you say, damned if you do, damned if you don’t.  It seems a good idea that the multi cylinder and grand prix machines have their own class.</p><p>Might I suggest that IHRO consider sourcing meetings at other  European circuits as well as road circuits, this would undoubtedly attract more entries from riders who will not ride on road circuits.  I appreciate it is not easy but in the days of InCA there were some good circuits and the entry fees were no more than entry fees are now.</p><p>I know the economic situation now means that a lot of riders are on a tight budget and those who would normally travel to Schleiz are no longer able to because the price of diesel etc., making it harder for the working man and the retired worker.  Therefore, we should be searching for circuits in Europe but closer i.e., France, Belgium and possibly Holland where the cost of getting there is not prohibitive.</p><p>I also feel that sump guards under engines should be compulsory for IHRO and also silencing should become compulsory as it is in the UK.  This would then allow IHRO to go to more circuits where these rules apply and we wouldn’t be racing on cement dust all the time.</p><p>I will continue to support IHRO as much as I can whatever is decided.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.ihro.org.uk @ 2012-02-10 07:19:59 -->
